The bonding stalemate is over.
I wish I could tell you what it was really about. I wish I could find someone who could say what it really was about. Ostensibly, it was about money, of course. Gov. M. Jodi Rell vetoed a $3.2 billion version, only to happily embrace a $2.8 billion package that passed nearly unanimously.
So, you might think, it was all about cutting $400 million. That's the message that Rell got to trumpet, allowing her to declare victory. You might think it was a political test, a Republican govenor vs. the "veto-proof" Democratic majorities in both houses.
Trouble is, the $400 million cut is not really a cut. The legislature can only authorize bonding. It is up to the governor to actually act on those authorizations, so there never was any chance that the $3.2 billion would be spent.
The stalemate could have been a political test. If Senate President Pro Tem Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, had won over one holdout Democrat, Sen. Joan Hartley of Waterbury, he could have engineered the first major override of a Rell veto.
Instead of cutting a deal with Hartley and handing Rell a political defeat, he cut one with Rell, proving, um, that he can handle a state senator. Hartley, by the way, voted for the final version.
Now, what was that all about?
-- Mark Pazniokas
Recent Comments