« Kanye to glow in Hartford May 16 | Main | Dolly Parton reschedules »

February 14, 2008

Comments

sjb

Who seals a time capsule in 1982 and then opens it 5 years later? ("Ooh, a can of Like cola! And it's still cold!")

Josh

"Girl is Mine" has got to be one of the worst songs ever recorded. (I like the idea that 7-year old Josh knew who Michael Jackson was, but needed his mom to tell him who the white guy was.) (I also thought of "You Can't Hurry Love" as a Phil Collins song, until corrected by said mom.)

As I continue to add nothing to this conversation ... there's a moment on Saved By The Bell in which the girls are fantasizing (well, it was Saturday morning, so let's say "chatting") about their dream date for the big Pumpkin Dance or whatever that week's plot was, and Lisa -- the black one -- says Michael Jackson would be hers.

Ah, comedy. Sure, Prince and Bruce Springsteen were great in 1982, but did they ever get references on Saved By The Bell? ... Googling ... Nothing! Thus, our time capsule from 1982, opened in 1987, should have Jackson and not Prince. Or Springsteen. It should also have that jingle, "I like the Sprite in you!"

critics+cynics

Will you be my valentine?

Eric replies: Sure, why not?

Ken

Hey Eric,

I agree that 'Thriller' sounds a bit dated. I'm actually more of an 'Off the Wall' guy myself, though I admit I enjoy both albums. I hate to be a self-promoter, but I actually just wrote feature on MJ for the website I used to blog for. It starts with a bio and moves into an annotated discography, 'ultimate playlist,' and video retrospective. If anyone is interested: http://www.ugo.com/music/michael-jackson/?cur=Bio

Richard

Does Justin Timberlake sound dated?

If he stole any more vocal chops from MJ he'd get sued.

sjb

I dunno, just because an album sounds dated, does that really make it less of a groundbreaker? Thriller pretty much set the tone for the early-to-mid 80s, so doesn't it make sense that the tone it set would be that of quintessential 80s pop?

All I'm saying is put that sucker in a time capsule slated to crack in 2082 and you could carbon date it right back to 1982... which is not necessarily a bad thing for a record that defined -- at least in part -- an era.

Eric replies: I'm not saying it's not groundbreaking, just that for all its innovation and pop-cultural importance, there's other stuff from that era I'd rather listen to.

The comments to this entry are closed.